WiLie about health effects of WiFi? Because plans for wireless control grid are “vital for UK economy”
Stop Smart Meters -
In case you missed it, last week the Independent published this article which pitches the infrastructure being primed to regulate and control almost every aspect of our lives.
A “futuristic plan”, the author contends, brought about by a “WiFi revolution” that could see “technology monitoring patients from a distance” and “take traffic off our roads”. A brave new world, where farming, healthcare, energy and transport are connected and controlled through a wireless ‘Internet of Things’.
What this piece (and many others like it) does not report, however, is any of the acute or chronic health effects associated with the pulsed microwave radiation which this so-called ‘revolution’ is based on.
Wireless technologies potentially have inter-generational consequences. Are we in the process of making the biggest mistake in human history?
It makes no mention of the potentially catastrophic inter-generational consequences of wireless technologies, such as the harm caused to the mitochondrial DNA of feotuses in utero.
No mention is made either of the profound impacts from wireless electrosmog to our wildlife – affecting countless biologically-sensitive species which have spent eons evolving with natural Earth resonances to now face a man-made sea of modulated microwaves that is billions upon billions of times higher than their natural systems are adapted to. The same goes for us.
Indeed there is much that is not talked about in this new world.
And the reason for this may be obvious – since the article actually starts with an admission from Ofcom’s CEO that:
“the future use of radio spectrum [is] of “vital” importance to the UK economy.”
Where have we heard something similar before? Oh, that’s right. In another Independent report about how the Treasury regarded smoking dangers as secondary to “the economy” (sadly though, by the time that was finally reported, it was a too late to take evasive action).
Instead of giving important insights into the evident health, privacy, safety and security dangers associated with this Technocratic version of an Orwellian future-scape, the article offers this insight into how our energy will in future be controlled:
“Individual electric devices are all monitored by electricity companies and the use of certain devices is restricted early in the evening to reduce demand for power in peak times. Reliance on large power stations is reduced, along with greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution.”
If you happened to miss it… that, friends, is why you are being pushed to have a Smart Meter.
And when it references “air pollution”, any reduction on that front will be overshadowed by a billowing cloud of electrosmog of frequencies which this T-Mobile-funded study reported as being capable of initiating and promoting the growth of cancer (amongst many other serious diseases). That’s an industry-funded study conducted by a world-class research institute. (There are plenty of others, too.)
On farming, it says:
“Sensors are sown to measure moisture at different levels. Data is sent to a central system so water can be sent to areas in need at rates that best permeate the ground. The need for pesticides and fertilisers is reduced. At harvest time, sensors watch the temperature of cereals and insect activity.”
And with edible RFID sensors now available, who wouldn’t want microchips embedded straight into their their patented frankenfoods from the get-go? Yum!
This is no joke, though. It is business – big business – with long-range strategic plans to bring your children “on-message” through their schoolwork in the classroom. Do you think any of the health risks will be on the curriculum as they browse their course notes on an iPad?
Read More: stopsmartmeters.org.uk
