A Man’s Defense of Individual Sovereignty Leaves Judge Speechless!!! But!!

4 Responses to A Man’s Defense of Individual Sovereignty Leaves Judge Speechless!!! But!!

1. 

   Graham Israel November 28, 2013 at 11:06 am

   This man is very brave more than you say about most of the brain washed sheeple out there. I believe he would have done better if he had used conditional acceptance on proof of claim by negative averment. This would have kept him in honour with the court that they could not have removed him from the court and in turn would have cornered the judge that she could not have moved any further in the case. 1. By holding her commercial liable by her own unlimited liability. 2. Holding her accountable by her oath of office under High treason subject to common law by the constitution. This does work because I have used it myself. When you start to argue with the court you are automatically in contract with the court. ( Argument is needed to give commercial energy for the judge to proceed in her commercial jurisdiction). Any way a very brave attempt, more people need to do this. Kind Rgds Graham

   Reply
   • 

     Sean H November 28, 2013 at 2:22 pm

     Watch it again Graham, he walked out the door by his own free will. He wasn’t removed from the court, the judge abandoned the court because she couldn’t handle the exposure of truth.
     Its best to write up an official affadavit for the court and write out your sovereignty status and why the charges are fictional against you. Make it clear that you know who and what they are. Then when you go into court you don’t recognise the Mr JOE BLOGGS, for example, when the judge trys to establish who you are. You claim to be the flesh and blood creature standing before the bench (latin for bank) and nothing more. You must secondly ask the judge if they are acting on their oath. A lot of judges are trying to say they don’t have to do that in recent times. If that happens you simlpy ask the judge how to proceed in a motion to have the case dismissed on the grounds that he / she will not swear upon their oath, and your concern of potential bias against you in the court because of this refusal. You do not even need to converse with the judge because you have written your fulll testimony of truth in the affidavit which you keep referring the judge to when they ask you further questions.

     Reply
2. 

   Shorn November 28, 2013 at 12:04 pm

   God help us all when we’re hungry and might feel like eating.

   Reply
3. 

   Breda Murphy. November 28, 2013 at 1:11 pm

   The lower courts .do not have judges but amds. It can and will have happen here in Ireland . As many people are now ,going hungry.

   Reply